Obasanjo not qualified to accuse anybody of corruption – Ayo Adebanjo
Afenifere chieftain, Chief Ayo Adebanjo,
says former President Olusegun Obasanjo has no moral right to accuse
anyone of being corrupt.
Describing Obasanjo as a “whited
sepulchre,” Adebanjo said the former President had not disputed that he
had only N20,000 in his bank account as of when he returned from the
prison in 1999 and that a former Vice-President, Atiku Abubakar, and a
businessman, Oyewole Fasawe, saved him from bankruptcy.
READ ALSO: Obasanjo attacks Buhari again, says he’s a failure
Adebanjo said if Nigeria were a decent
society, people like Obasanjo would never feature in public life again,
saying it continued to amaze him how people continued to give the former
President “undue prominence in spite of his known character.”
He said he was sure that “when a real
government of the people comes into power, they would take Obasanjo’s
Presidential Library Complex in Abeokuta” from the former President.
Adebanjo, who will turn 90 years on
April 10, said these in his autobiography, Telling it as it is, which
was publicly presented in Lagos on Tuesday.
He attacked the former President,
particularly in chapter 13 of the 233-page book, which he titled,
‘Awolowo, Obasanjo and the Yoruba Nation.’
At the event, chaired by a former
military Vice-President, Cmdr. Ebitu Ukiwe (retd.), were the national
leader of the All Progressives Congress, Bola Tinubu, and former
governors of Ogun State, Chief Olusegun Osoba and Otunba Gbenga Daniel.
Also present was a former Commonwealth
Secretary General, Chief Emeka Anyaoku, a former Secretary to the
Government of the Federation, Chief Olu Falae, a former Minister of
State for Defence, Musiliu Obanikoro, a former Minister of Industry,
Mrs. Nike Akande, the founder of Latter Rain Assembly, Pastor Tunde
Bakare, and Chief Albert Horsfall.
Also present were the Chairman of First
Bank Nigeria, Mrs. Ibukun Awosika, industrialist, Chief Rasaq Okoya,
Prof. Pat Utomi and Tony Elumelu.
In his book, Adebanjo described
Obasanjo’s eight years in government between 1999 and 2007 as a civilian
President as a tragedy and calamity, declaring that his scorecard was
nothing to write home about.
He wrote, “The man who carried on as if
he was all-in-all failed woefully on all counts as President. His
eight-year tenure (1999-2007) was a tragedy. His scorecard was nothing
to write home about. What did he do in eight years? Before he came, we
were buying fuel for N20 per litre, and crude oil was $23 per barrel. In
2007, under his regime, we were buying fuel at N75 per litre, and crude
oil was between $65 and $75 per barrel. In the worst days of Abacha,
one dollar was over N120.”
Adebanjo, a disciple of the late sage,
Chief Obafemi Awolowo, said Obasanjo humiliated Awolowo, when the latter
visited him to discuss the interest of the Yoruba after Obasanjo became
the military head of state following the assassination of Maj. Gen.
Murtala Mohammed on February 13, 1976.
He said, “There are many incidents to
show that Obasanjo is anti-Yoruba. He has no interest in, or sympathy
for the Yoruba cause, he only has his own interest for everything he
does. That is my conclusion, and I have copious evidence to prove it.”
Adebanjo also blamed Obasanjo for the
collapse of the Alliance for Democracy by picking the late Bola Ige, a
member of the AD, as a minister in 1999 against the wish of the party.
He said, “As far as I am concerned, the
moment Bola Ige joined Obasanjo’s government, following his (Bola Ige)
loss of AD’s presidential primaries where he polled six votes against
Chief Olu Falae’s 17, marked the beginning of the end of the party. In
my opinion, these are the scenarios which led to the collapse of the
AD.”
In his remarks at the event, Anyaoku
described Adebanjo as “one of those who have been responsible in
creating the history of our country.”
Anyaoku said like Adebanjo, he witnessed the time when Nigeria operated regional governments and did very well.
He said, “I lived in those years and
there has never been any doubt in my mind that our country, Nigeria, was
doing extremely well when it had a true federation of four regions,
with each region developing at its own pace, with its citizens feeling
proud to belong to the bigger Nigerian country.
“We have since, of course, lost that
basic structure of governance and when we think about the progress we
were making in those days, we think, first and foremost of the Western
Region under the leadership of Chief Obafemi Awolowo… Those were days
when there was healthy competition in the Eastern Region of Nigeria,
Chief Awolowo’s counterpart, Dr. Michael Okpara, was also focusing on
the development of his region; the agricultural development in eastern
Nigeria was very significant; and in the Northern Region, Sir Ahmadu
Bello was also learning from the experience of his colleagues in the
Western Region, the Eastern Region and the Mid-West Region.
“Those were days when you could talk
about the famous groundnut pyramids in northern Nigeria or talk about
the vast plantations of cotton that Nigeria was producing and indeed,
you could talk about the very high quality hides and skin, which were
being marketed abroad as Moroccan leather because of their superior
quality. And the country as a whole was doing reasonably well.”
Anyaoku blamed the military intervention
for the woes of the country, arguing that the military should not have
altered the constitution.
He said, “I believe that if the military
had not intervened in our governance in January 1966 and remained in
power for so many years and if they had not disfigured our constitution,
I used the word disfigured advisedly, because I do not believe that
there is any country in the world that has the diversity that Nigeria
has, diversity of peoples who have lived for several centuries in their
geographical areas, who have their distinct cultural traditions.
“I don’t believe there is anywhere in
the world where such a country with such diversity can live under a
unitary government. So, we do need in Nigeria, a true federal structure
and this was one of the abiding thoughts that Chief Obafemi Awolowo
advocated throughout his life and the legacy that he left.”
Also speaking, Tinubu described Adebanjo
as a principled and upright man, saying he owed his election as
governor of Lagos State in 1999 to Adebanjo’s insistence on fair play.
Tinubu said he aligned with Adebanjo on the call for restructuring and true federalism.
He said, “I respect him for his
principled stand on issues of the country. If you don’t understand him,
you might say he is divisive but what is the meaning of restructuring,
if not true federalism? If not about freedom and opportunity for each
federating units to come up with their blueprints, govern and promote
the unity of the country. What is the meaning of restructuring, if it is
not about resource management and opportunity for true federalism in
any democratic setting? I agree with that and I am with him on that.”
No comments